Mentally Defective Children — A Reader’s Guide

(0 User reviews)   273
In Category - Teaching Methods
Binet, Alfred, 1857-1911, Simon, Théodore, 1873-, Drummond, William Blackley, 1868-1937 [Translator] Project Gutenberg 2011 Not confirmed
Children with mental disabilities -- Education; Children with mental disabilities -- Psychological testing Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 56,242
Reading time 245 min
Text sections 9

The catalog record for Mentally Defective Children — A Reader’s Guide provides practical reading context through 56,242 words, 4 hr 5 min estimated reading time, and 9 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 18.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Children with mental disabilities -- Education,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

Binet and Simon detail their method for identifying mentally defective children in French schools, emphasizing a multi-step screening process involving teachers, inspectors, and medical exams. The text includes the original Binet-Simon intelligence tests and discusses statistical pitfalls in measuring retardation.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.7/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

They were surprised at children of twelve years who made replies of which in reality normal children of eight should have been capable. It is impossible to form a correct judgment about matters so delicate unless one makes use of exact tests. We insist upon this because we foresee that all who visit the class for defectives will be subject to this illusion. All the more will they have an optimistic tendency to overestimate the intelligence and instruction of the children since they know in advance that they are going to see defectives, and consequently have a preconceived expectation of seeing degraded imbeciles with low foreheads and dirty habits. They will be quite surprised to find that the great majority of defectives do not answer to this description, and seeing that they have fallen into an error, they will correct themselves as usual by falling into the opposite mistake.

=Estimation of Want of Balance.=--If it is easy to determine backwardness by a direct examination of a child's state of instruction, the difficulty of establishing a lack of mental balance is, on the other hand, very great. Such want of balance is indicated by breaches of discipline, inattention, naughtiness, lying, violence, brutality, etc. But it would be a very unruly child who would not behave quietly when taken apart by the inspector. Isolated in the examination room, surrounded by strange, grave people, the child shrinks into himself. He has little occasion or desire for a display of rebellion or naughtiness when his comrades are not there to admire him. Possibly an exact estimation of his reactions, of his motor ability, of his power of attention, would indicate the presence of some anomalies; but this is not certain, and is not to be relied upon. There may be some hope in that direction for the pedagogy of the future, but scientific investigations cannot help us to-day. In short, mental want of balance cannot, in the majority of cases, be the object of direct examination.

How, then, can it be estimated? Indirectly, by the evidence of others.

The inspector, then, must be content to accept the facts which are given to him by the teacher, but he must not accept them altogether on trust. Are these facts correct? Are they probable? Is any evidence of them to be found? Have they been altered in the telling? Such will be the first queries to awaken the critical spirit of the inspector. Then it must not be forgotten that he can question the parents, and hear their replies before letting them know the opinion of the teacher, and that everything they say will help him to judge not only the child, but the family circumstances in which he lives. The ill-balanced are often spoiled, or only children, or children not looked after, or children whose father has disappeared. The sons of widows form a considerable contingent. Now, the inspector will gain a good deal of information from the school history of the child. The ill-balanced is a nomad. He has attended several schools. It is important to find out what impression he has left behind him. The proof of want of balance is not to be taken from a single teacher. If three teachers, at least, whose pedagogic reputation is good, agree about a child, the chances are that their estimate is correct. The inspector will resort to such controls, and if he is not satisfied, and if the alleged facts are not very serious, he will remove the child to another class or another school rather than send him to a class for defectives.

Binet and Simon open their work not with a theory of intelligence but with a practical, bureaucratic procedure. The first chapter lays out a five-step screening system: teachers flag children with poor attendance or discipline problems, the inspector reviews the returns, then directly examines each child's instruction and intelligence, and finally a schedule of particulars is filled. The authors insist that all decisions are provisional—children enter special classes on trial, kept under observation. This cautious, iterative approach contrasts sharply with the later reification of the Binet-Simon tests as a universal IQ gauge.

The Inspector's Five-Step Screen

The authors devote considerable space to the administrative mechanics of selection. The inspector first examines returns on school attendance and alleged faults, then makes a preliminary choice. The direct examination focuses on the child's state of instruction and degree of intelligence. The inspector reaches a positive decision with the opinion of the doctor and the head of the special school. Finally, the teacher fills a schedule of particulars for each accepted child. This process is explicitly designed to be provisional—children are admitted on trial and kept under observation. The emphasis on provisionality suggests that Binet and Simon saw classification as a working hypothesis, not a fixed label.

Statistical Caution and the Median

In a footnote on spelling tests, Binet and Simon demonstrate statistical sophistication. They warn that using the average number of mistakes can be disastrous because a single child making a hundred errors would unfairly raise the average. They recommend the median instead, which is less affected by aberrant cases. This technical choice reflects their awareness that heterogeneous groups require robust measures. The same caution appears in their criticism of teachers who classify children by intelligence without accounting for age—a practice they call fallacious. They note that an older child in a younger class may appear superior simply due to age, not ability.

The Edinburgh Dictation Comparison

The translator, W.B. Drummond, adds a comparative experiment: ninety-two children in an Edinburgh school were given dictation sentences of increasing difficulty. The results are tabulated by age, showing average mistakes for four test sentences. For example, children aged 7 to 8 averaged 0.22 mistakes on the simplest sentence but 6.18 on the hardest. This data, inserted by the translator, illustrates how the tests might be adapted to English-speaking contexts. The sentences themselves progress from simple declaratives to complex descriptions involving weather and farming, revealing the linguistic assumptions embedded in the testing materials.

Readers should approach this text as a historical document of educational psychology in formation. The Binet-Simon tests appear here not as a finished instrument but as a work-in-progress, embedded in a specific French administrative context. Pay attention to the footnotes: they reveal the authors' methodological debates and the translator's own experiments. The book's value lies less in its conclusions than in its demonstration of how early psychologists grappled with the practical problem of identifying children who needed special education.

That rainy afternoon, Binet and Simon’s careful screening felt like a gentle plea for patience with every child’s uneven mind. Their charts and tests, so methodical, still left room for wonder. Later, I stumbled onto Popular Education For the use of Parents and Teachers, and for Young Persons of Both Sexes — Inside the Classic, which seemed to answer their questions with a warmer, more hopeful voice. The two books sat side by side, quietly conversing.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Before you leave, reflect on the book

Use these questions to collect your thoughts before moving on.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Have you finished this book?

2

How much did you enjoy the reading experience?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

What was the reading difficulty like?

Related eBooks