College Teaching Studies in Methods of Teaching in the College — Reading Notes

(0 User reviews)   665
In Category - Teaching Methods
Klapper, Paul, 1885-1952 Project Gutenberg 2009 Not confirmed
Teaching; Universities and colleges -- United States Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 197,880
Reading time 861 min
Text sections 29

The catalog record for College Teaching Studies in Methods of Teaching in the College — Reading Notes provides practical reading context through 197,880 words, 14 hr 21 min estimated reading time, and 29 detected text sections.

The text analysis averages about 23.8 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Teaching,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

This 1920 edited volume by Paul Klapper examines college teaching methods across disciplines, with a focus on general pedagogy and subject-specific approaches. The excerpts reveal a tension between traditional lectures and emerging techniques like the case method and problem-based learning, particularly in political science.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.9/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

was a time when it was felt, probably correctly, that a satisfactory college training could be had by requiring all students to follow a single prescribed course of study. At that time, college students were drawn almost exclusively from families and homes of a single type or kind. Their purposes in after-life were similar, and their range of intellectual sympathy, while intense, was rather narrow. The last fifty years have changed all this. College students are now drawn from families and homes of every conceivable type and kind. Their purposes in after-life are very different, while new subjects of study have been multiplied many fold. The old and useful tradition of Latin, Greek, and mathematics, together with a little history and literature, as the chief elements in a college course of study, had to give way when first the natural sciences, and then the social sciences, claimed attention and when even these older subjects of study were themselves subdivided into many parts.

These changes forced a change in the old-fashioned program of college study, and led to the various substitutes for it that now exist. Whether a college prefers the elective system of study, or the group system, or some other method of combining instruction that is regarded as fundamental with other instruction that is regarded as less so, the fact is that all these are simply different kinds of attempt to meet a new condition which is the natural result of intellectual and economic changes. Just now the college is in a state of transition. It is not at all clear precisely what its status will be a generation hence, or how far present tendencies may continue to increase, or how far they may be counteracted by a swing of the pendulum in the opposite direction. Therefore this is a time to describe rather than to dogmatize, and it is description which is the characteristic mark of the important series of papers which constitute the several chapters in the present volume.

A careful reading of these papers is commended not only to the great army of college teachers and college students, but to that still greater army of those who, whether as alumni or as parents or as citizens, are deeply concerned with the preservation of the influence and character of the American college for its effect upon our national standards of thought and action.

American colleges are of two distinct types, and it may be that the future has in store a different position for each type. The true distinction between colleges is according as they are separate or are incorporated in a university system, and not at all as to whether they are large or small. A separate college, such as Amherst or Beloit or Grinnell or Pomona, has its own peculiar problems of support and administration. The university college, on the other hand, such as Columbia or Harvard or Chicago or the college of any state university, has quite different problems of support and of administration. It is not unlikely that the distinction between these two types of college will become more sharply marked as years go by, and that eventually they will appear to be two distinct institutions rather than two types of one and the same institution.

Meanwhile, we have to deal with the college as it is, in all its varied forms, but characteristically American whatever its form. The American college has little or no resemblance to the English Public School or to the French Lycée or to the German Gymnasium. It is something more than any one of these, and at the same time something less. It differs from them all very much as the conditions of American life differ from those of English or of French or of German life. The college may or may not involve residence, but when it does involve residence, it is at its best. It is then that the largest amount of carefully ordered and stimulating influence can be brought to bear upon the daily life of growing and expanding youth, and it is then and only then, that youth can get the inestimable benefits which follow from daily and hourly contact with others of like age, like tastes, like habits, and like purposes. Indeed, it has often been said that the college gives more through its opportunities which attach to residence, than through its opportunities which attach to instruction.

Paul Klapper's College Teaching opens with a striking admission: the literature on college pedagogy is "surprisingly undeveloped" and the field is "almost virgin." This 1920 collection, co-authored by specialists in various disciplines, positions itself as a pioneer in a domain where hostility to pedagogical study was common among professors. The preface directly addresses this resistance, arguing that subject expertise alone does not guarantee effective teaching.

The excerpts from the chapter on teaching government illustrate a discipline in transition. The author describes a shift from formal, historical, and theoretical study toward an emphasis on administration, field work, and the problem method. The case method, borrowed from law, is noted as having "undoubtedly improved" certain phases of instruction, yet the author also warns against over-reliance on secondary sources and quickly outdated case collections.

A Deliberate, Argumentative Preface

The preface sets a measured, persuasive tone. Klapper does not merely announce the book's purpose; he builds a case for its necessity. He notes that investigators of college problems have been "considerably discouraged by the facts they have gathered," a phrase that implies empirical research had already revealed shortcomings. The language is careful and academic, yet carries an undercurrent of urgency: "the need for constructive programs is acute."

Klapper also anticipates criticism. He acknowledges the "active hostility to the study of pedagogy" among college professors and counters it by emphasizing that the contributors were selected precisely because they are respected subject-matter experts, not education theorists. This rhetorical strategy—preempting objections by framing the work as a collaborative effort by insiders—shapes the reader's expectations for the chapters that follow.

The Government Chapter: A Case Study in Methodological Debate

The chapter on teaching government reveals a discipline grappling with its own methods. The author catalogs a range of techniques: informal lectures combined with recitations, the case method, problem sheets, field work, and independent study. The tone is evaluative rather than purely descriptive. For instance, the case method is praised for its effectiveness in law but critiqued for encouraging reliance on secondary sources and for becoming outdated quickly—"opinions and data change so rapidly that any collection of cases and materials is out of date before it issues from the press."

This critical stance suggests that the volume aims not to prescribe a single best method but to foster reflective practice. The author also notes a shift in emphasis from political theory to administrative practices, indicating that the content of courses was being reshaped alongside pedagogical approaches. The chapter thus functions as both a report on current practices and an argument for continued innovation.

Voice and Structure: Collaborative Authority

The book's structure—an editor's general chapters plus contributions from specialists—creates a layered voice. Klapper's preface speaks with the authority of an editor who has surveyed the field, while the chapter authors write from within their disciplines. The government chapter, for example, uses first-person plural ("we have found") and specific references to course levels (preliminary, advanced, senior, graduate), grounding its claims in practical experience.

The prose is formal but not opaque. Sentences are often long and clause-heavy, yet they maintain clarity through parallel structure and careful qualification. The repeated use of phrases like "it is possible" and "there is a tendency" reflects a cautious, evidence-based stance. This measured voice aligns with the book's stated goal of initiating a "scientific study of college pedagogy" rather than offering dogmatic prescriptions.

Readers approaching College Teaching should attend to the interplay between the editor's general framework and the discipline-specific chapters. The excerpts suggest that the book is as much a historical document of pedagogical debates in the early twentieth century as it is a practical guide. The critical tone in the government chapter—questioning even methods it endorses—invites readers to consider how the tensions between tradition and innovation persist in contemporary higher education.

Some evenings, I think of that 1920 volume on college teaching, fussing over lectures and case methods. It felt like watching a patient gardener turn soil. Then my eyes rest on Dr. Montessori's Own Handbook — Reading Companion, and I recall a similar quiet reverence for letting a child’s mind find its own roots. Both whisper the same old truth.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

Record your reading impressions

A brief reflection can help important ideas stay with you longer.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

How far have you progressed with this book?

2

Did this book hold your interest?

3

Is this a title you would suggest to others?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks