A Letter of affectionate remonstrance addressed to the members of the Established Church in Norwich and in Norfolk and occasioned by the proposed exclusive system of — Story, Setting & Ideas

(0 User reviews)   959
In Category - Teaching Methods
Alexander, John, 1792-1868 Project Gutenberg 2020 Not confirmed
Church and education -- England Readers of public-domain and historical texts
Project Gutenberg digital edition en

Edition facts

Words 6,625
Reading time 29 min
Text sections 1

This digital edition of A Letter of affectionate remonstrance addressed to the members of the Established Church in Norwich and in Norfolk and occasioned by the proposed exclusive system of — Story, Setting & Ideas is described by source-level measurements including 6,625 words, 29 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.

The text analysis averages about 31.0 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.

Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Church and education -- England,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.

John Alexander's 1836 open letter to Norwich church members argues against sectarian infant schools, using Samuel Wilderspin's testimony to advocate for inclusive, non-denominational education.
Share
Editorial Edition Score 4.3/5

Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.

How this score is calculated
  • Description quality20 pts
  • Title & short description10 pts
  • Source metadata20 pts
  • Text length15 pts
  • Chapters / structure15 pts
  • EPUB file integrity20 pts

Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.

Edition quality

Read the Text

Transcribed from the 1836 J. Fletcher edition by David Price.

A LETTER OF AFFECTIONATE REMONSTRANCE ADDRESSED TO THE MEMBERS OF THE ESTABLISHED CHURCH

In Norwich and in Norfolk,

THE PROPOSED EXCLUSIVE SYSTEM

BY JOHN ALEXANDER, MINISTER OF PRINCE’S STREET CHAPEL, NORWICH.

“There are still some who wish to confine the element of water to their own well, and to find the full ripe corn only in their own fields. With them, I confess, I have no sympathy.”

SOLD BY J. FLETCHER; JARROLD & SONS; AND THE OTHER BOOKSELLERS. 1836.

IT would have been most agreeable to the author of the following letter to have published it anonymously; but he thought that, however insignificant a writer might be, it was more respectful to the parties addressed to affix his name to his publication. His object, in writing it, he can truly say, has not been to offend, but to convince; and, though he feels deeply on the subject of the letter, it would have been highly unbecoming, when addressing a respectable and influential body of persons, to convey his remonstrance in any other language than that of affectionate fidelity and firmness. He has never yet come forward, on any occasion, to widen the distance which may exist between any denominations of Christians; and he feels, increasingly, the importance of employing his single talent in promoting the salvation of sinners, and the holiness and peace of the Christian Church.

_Norwich_, _March_ 28_th_, 1836.

AN advertisement has appeared in the Norwich papers of the 26th instant, announcing that “a public meeting of members of the Established Church will be held in the Hall in the Market, Norwich, on Thursday, 7th of April, for the purpose of forming a Society to promote the extension of the Infant School system in the County and City.” It is somewhat remarkable that a notice of such importance, and addressed to a large and respectable body of Christians, should have been inserted in the public papers _anonymously_, and that you should be called upon to assemble in the Hall, without knowing by whose authority such an assembly is convened, and without even knowing who is to preside on the occasion. Believing, however, that the advertisement does proceed from some competent authority, and perceiving, from the terms in which it is expressed, that all the inhabitants of this City, except “the members of the Established Church,” are prohibited from attending the meeting, I take the liberty, as one of the excluded party, of addressing you from the press—and my object in so doing, is to explain to you the principles on which the Infant schools in Norwich have hitherto been conducted, and to recommend those principles to your adoption at the approaching meeting.

You are probably aware that several friends to the education of children, and especially to their moral and religious education, have originated, and, for some years, supported Infant schools in this neighbourhood, the principal of which are to be found in Lakenham, in Crook’s Place, and in the parish of St. Miles. These schools have hitherto been conducted not on sectarian, but on catholic and Christian principles. Children of all classes have been admitted as scholars, and, besides imparting to them the elements of general knowledge, they have been taught, according to their capacities, the facts and histories recorded in the Holy Scriptures, and the great doctrines relative to the sinfulness of man, and to the redemption which is in Christ Jesus, on which the majority of Christians are agreed. The committees of these schools are composed of members of the Establishment and of other Christian churches, all of whom, without the slightest degree of jealousy, or of difficulty, have cordially united in carrying into effect both the intellectual and the religious parts of the system. The committee of the Lakenham school, though it, as well as the other schools, is, I believe, chiefly supported by Dissenters, has, I am informed, regularly invited the respected clergyman of the parish to attend its meetings; and my connexion with the school in St. Miles’, enables me to declare, most confidently, that repeated efforts have been made to induce members of the Established church to afford greater help in directing its concerns, as well as in defraying its expenses. I have no doubt that in the other schools, equally liberal measures have been adopted.

John Alexander, minister of Prince’s Street Chapel, Norwich, published this open letter in 1836 to oppose a proposed exclusive infant school system for the Church of England. The letter is addressed directly to members of the Established Church in Norwich and Norfolk, adopting a tone of “affectionate remonstrance” that blends pastoral concern with firm argument. Alexander anchors his case in the writings of Samuel Wilderspin, a prominent infant school advocate, quoting him extensively to show that the “originator of Infant schools” rejected sectarian control. The pamphlet’s structure moves from a specific local advertisement to broader principles, using Wilderspin’s experiences in towns like Taunton and Sheffield as evidence that mixed committees of Churchmen and Dissenters can succeed harmoniously.

A Local Dispute with National Implications

The pamphlet opens by noting an anonymous advertisement in Norwich papers calling a meeting to form a Church-only infant school society. Alexander seizes on this anonymity as a weakness, questioning the authority behind the summons. He then widens the scope, arguing that excluding Dissenters contradicts the practice in other towns where “the union between Churchmen and Dissenters is delightful.” By grounding his argument in a specific local event—the meeting scheduled for April 7, 1836—Alexander makes the abstract issue of sectarianism concrete. His method is to test the proposed exclusive system against real outcomes elsewhere, a rhetorical strategy that gives the letter its persuasive force.

Wilderspin’s Testimony as a Touchstone

Alexander leans heavily on Samuel Wilderspin’s book, quoting passages that praise “freedom from all shackles” and “entire exemption from sectarianism.” He cites Wilderspin’s account of Sheffield, where five schools with nearly a thousand infants operated with “harmony of Churchmen and Dissenters.” The quotations are woven into Alexander’s own prose, creating a layered argument: the expert on infant schools opposes exclusivity, and his practical experience proves that inclusive systems work. Alexander does not merely cite Wilderspin; he positions him as an authority whose observations trump local prejudice. This reliance on a single source gives the letter a focused, almost forensic quality.

The Rhetoric of Affectionate Firmness

Alexander’s tone is carefully calibrated. He calls his readers “Christian Friends” and insists his object is “not to offend, but to convince.” Yet the letter contains sharp phrases: he calls the exclusive proposal “a suicidal act” for the church and dismisses opposing arguments as “too trifling even for ridicule.” This blend of politeness and polemic reflects the pamphlet’s genre—a public letter that must maintain decorum while pressing a contentious point. Alexander also uses biblical language, closing with a quotation from Galatians about “a new creature,” to frame his position as the truly Christian one. The tension between affectionate address and firm remonstrance is the letter’s central stylistic feature.

A Blueprint for Inclusive Action

In the final pages, Alexander shifts from critique to proposal. He urges Dissenters, if excluded, not to retaliate by forming their own exclusive society. Instead, they should call a meeting of “all denominations of Christians who can conscientiously unite” and invite liberal Churchmen to cooperate. He insists that infant schools should teach neither conformity nor nonconformity, but only “the sincere milk of the word.” This positive vision is brief but specific: a mixed committee, a public meeting, and a curriculum free from sectarian doctrine. Alexander thus ends not with a complaint but with a constructive alternative, grounded in the very principle of catholicity he has defended throughout.

Readers approaching this letter for the first time should attend to how Alexander builds his case from a single local advertisement to a general principle. The pamphlet is short—under 7,000 words—and its argument unfolds in a clear sequence: problem, evidence, rebuttal, solution. Pay particular attention to the quoted passages from Wilderspin, which serve as both evidence and emotional appeal. Alexander’s own voice, alternating between pastoral warmth and indignation, gives the letter its distinctive character. This is not a theoretical treatise but a timely intervention in a specific controversy, and its power lies in that immediacy.

Years at this desk teach you how certain books speak to each other across the shelves. Alexander's fierce, gentle plea for children's minds to wander free of sectarian walls always puts me in mind of that quieter volume, A Montessori Mother — Inside the Classic. Both trust the child's own unfolding, trusting patience over prescription. That old Norwich argument feels like a whisper of the same faith. Such kinship is a rare, warming thing.

There are no reviews for this eBook.

0
0 out of 5 (0 User reviews )

Add a Review

Your Rating *
There are no comments for this eBook.

Reader reflection

How will you remember this book?

Save your reaction, strongest insight, and memorable passage.

Your progress 0 / 10
1

Where are you in your reading?

2

How did the book work for you overall?

3

Would you encourage someone else to read it?

4

Did the language feel accessible?

Related eBooks