The Educational Writings of Richard Mulcaster — Inside the Classic
Edition facts
Before opening The Educational Writings of Richard Mulcaster — Inside the Classic, the edition data offers a quick orientation: 81,147 words, 5 hr 53 min estimated reading time, and 11 detected text sections.
The text analysis averages about 36.5 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Education -- History,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
Italic text is denoted by _underscores_.
Obvious typographical errors and punctuation errors have been corrected after careful comparison with other occurrences within the text and consultation of external sources.
No other changes have been made to the text.
THE EDUCATIONAL WRITINGS OF RICHARD MULCASTER
PUBLISHED BY JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS, GLASGOW, Publishers to the University.
MACMILLAN AND CO., LTD., LONDON.
_New York_, _The Macmillan Co._ _London_, _Simpkin, Hamilton and Co._ _Cambridge_, _Macmillan and Bowes_. _Edinburgh_, _Douglas and Foulis_.
_ABRIDGED AND ARRANGED, WITH A CRITICAL ESTIMATE_
JAMES OLIPHANT, M.A., F.R.S.E.
AUTHOR OF “VICTORIAN NOVELISTS,” ETC.
GLASGOW JAMES MACLEHOSE AND SONS Publishers to the University 1903
GLASGOW: PRINTED AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS BY ROBERT MACLEHOSE AND CO.
Some apology is needed for the presentation of an Elizabethan writer to English readers in any form but that of the original text. The justification of the present volume must lie in the fact that in the three centuries and more that have elapsed since the educational writings of Richard Mulcaster were given to the world, they have entirely failed to gain acceptance as literature. This neglect of one of our most interesting and important educationists is no doubt chiefly to be regarded as part of the general indifference which until recently the British public has consistently shown to all discussion of educational problems, but when we consider the reputation of Mulcaster’s contemporary, Roger Ascham, who had far less to say, but knew how to say it with lucidity and grace, we are constrained to admit that Mulcaster has lost his opportunity of catching the world’s ear, and that if his writings are to be known and appreciated as they deserve by this generation, it must be rather for their substance than for their literary style. It is true that the serious student may now be trusted to investigate for himself the thoughts of earlier authors in spite of difficulties of form and expression, but the general reader will expect more help than, in the case of Mulcaster at least, is at present available. The earlier of his two chief works, the _Positions_, published in 1581, was out of print for 300 years, until the issue in 1888 of an almost facsimile edition by the late Mr. Quick, to whom the credit of discovering this author is mainly due, while the second work, the _Elementarie_, has never been reprinted at all. It is safe to assume that not many readers will care to possess themselves of the somewhat expensive reprint of the former work, or to institute a search for one of the rare copies of the original and only edition of the latter. And if these books were to be made more accessible, it seemed worth while at the same time to present them in such a form that they should be readily intelligible to the ordinary reader. In the case of an acknowledged literary classic it may be inadmissible to tamper even with the type and spelling, far more with the phraseology and arrangement of sentences, but such scruples would be out of place with the author now in question. An attempt has been made to remove all gratuitous hindrances to a full understanding of the author’s meaning, while omitting nothing that is at once characteristic and significant. It is hoped that in the process of adaptation as little as possible has been lost of the quaint flavour of the original, and of the gifts of expression that Mulcaster undoubtedly possessed, however much these were obscured by the euphuistic tendency and the somewhat laboured construction that marked the prose of his time.
THE METHOD OF TREATMENT, 1
THE PURPOSE OF WRITING, 2
REASONS FOR WRITING IN ENGLISH, 4
THE USE OF AUTHORITY, 7
THE IDEAL AND THE POSSIBLE, 11
WHEN SCHOOL EDUCATION SHOULD BEGIN, 12
RISK OF OVERPRESSURE, 13
MENS SANA IN CORPORE SANO, 14
PHYSICAL EXERCISE NEEDS REGULATION, 15
PHYSICAL AND MENTAL TRAINING SHOULD GO TOGETHER, 15
EXERCISE SPECIALLY NECESSARY FOR STUDENTS, 16
THE BEST KINDS OF EXERCISE, 17
FOOTBALL AS A FORM OF EXERCISE, 17
IS EDUCATION TO BE OFFERED TO BOTH SEXES? 18
ALL CANNOT RECEIVE A LEARNED EDUCATION, 19
CHOICE OF SCHOLARS BOTH FROM RICH AND POOR, 20
THE NUMBER OF SCHOLARS LIMITED BY CIRCUMSTANCES, 21
THE NUMBER OF SCHOLARS KEPT DOWN BY LAW, 22
TALENT NOT PECULIAR EITHER TO RICH OR POOR, 22
CHOICE OF THOSE FIT FOR LEARNING, 23
HOW THE CHOICE OF SCHOLARS, SHOULD BE DETERMINED, 24
GROUNDS FOR PROMOTION, 25
CO-OPERATION OF PARENTS, 27
ADMISSION INTO COLLEGES, 28
PREFERMENT TO DEGREES, 29
NATURAL CAPACITY IN CHILDREN, 30
ENCOURAGEMENT BETTER THAN SEVERITY, 32
MORAL TRAINING FALLS CHIEFLY ON PARENTS, 32
ELEMENTARY INSTRUCTION--READING, 33
THE VERNACULAR FIRST, 34
MATERIAL OF READING, 35
ELEMENTARY PERIOD A TIME OF PROBATION, 37
FOUR ELEMENTARY SUBJECTS, 42
STUDY OF LANGUAGES, 44
EDUCATION OF GIRLS, 50
AIM OF EDUCATION FOR GIRLS, 53
WHEN THEIR EDUCATION SHOULD BEGIN, 54
ALL SHOULD HAVE ELEMENTARY EDUCATION, 55
HIGHER STUDIES FOR SOME, 57
WHAT HIGHER STUDIES ARE SUITABLE, 58
James Oliphant, in his 1903 preface, frankly acknowledges that Richard Mulcaster's Elizabethan educational treatises have 'entirely failed to gain acceptance as literature' and that their neglect stems partly from their stylistic density. This abridgment therefore presents Mulcaster's substance rather than his original form, drawing from the 1581 Positions and the never-reprinted 1582 Elementarie. The excerpts reveal a writer deeply concerned with uniformity in schooling, domestic discipline, and the alignment of education with civil order.
Regularity as a Social Foundation
Mulcaster repeatedly insists on 'regularity' as the linchpin of education, extending it beyond the schoolroom into the home and church. He urges parents to act 'so in the home that there may be conformity between their management and that of the school,' warning against 'infection from private corruption.' His prescriptions are strikingly specific: children should have fixed times for rising, bed, prayers, and greeting parents. He argues that 'obedience to the prince and to the laws is securely grounded when private houses are so well ordered,' and that 'there is little need for preaching when private training is so carefully carried out.' This vision of education as a mechanism for social discipline is central to his thought.
The Editor's Apology and Method
Oliphant's preface is itself a revealing document. He notes that Mulcaster's contemporary Roger Ascham 'had far less to say, but knew how to say it with lucidity and grace,' implying that Mulcaster's obscurity is self-inflicted. The editor justifies his abridgment by asserting that the writings 'must be rather for their substance than for their literary style.' He also records that the Positions was out of print for 300 years until a facsimile edition in 1888, and the Elementarie 'has never been reprinted at all.' This editorial framing shapes how readers encounter Mulcaster: as a thinker whose ideas merit recovery despite their original form.
Mulcaster's Rhetoric of Counsel
In his own voice, Mulcaster adopts a posture of humility and persuasion. He writes 'not because I am greatly dissatisfied with what we have, but because I often wish for what we have not.' He explicitly rejects a 'dictator-like' pronouncement, preferring 'the way of counsel.' He grounds his principles on 'reading, and some reasonable experience,' applied to 'the circumstances of this country, without attempting to enforce any foreign or strange device.' This rhetorical strategy—combining deference with a clear reformist agenda—reveals a writer acutely aware of his audience and the need to win them over 'by argument' rather than 'precise brevity.'
Readers should note that this edition is an abridgment and arrangement, not a complete reproduction. Oliphant's selections and his critical estimate shape the presentation of Mulcaster's ideas. The excerpts show a thinker focused on uniformity, discipline, and the integration of school, home, and state, but the full range of his arguments—particularly on curriculum and the education of girls—may be more fully represented in the original texts. This volume is best approached as a curated introduction to an influential but stylistically challenging Elizabethan educationist.
Mulcaster’s stern plea for orderly minds and state-appointed learning always puts me in mind of a quieter volume, one that lingers over the same old questions with a softer tread. Both sit well on a shelf, like patient friends who nod to each other across the years. In the School-Room: Chapters in the Philosophy of Education — A Reader’s Guide carries that same earnest, unhurried warmth—a hand extended from another century, offering company rather than command.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
Your personal reading reflection
Build a private reading journal entry for this title.