NREN for All: Insurmountable Opportunity — Text and Context
Edition facts
The catalog record for NREN for All: Insurmountable Opportunity — Text and Context provides practical reading context through 7,212 words, 32 min estimated reading time, and 1 detected text section.
The text analysis averages about 20.4 words per sentence, while the detected sections provide another way to judge how the source is divided.
Project Gutenberg metadata also associates the work with “Internet,” connecting these edition facts with the source record’s subject description.
Calculated from edition completeness, EPUB availability, text structure and catalogue metadata. Not a user rating.
How this score is calculated
- Description quality20 pts
- Title & short description10 pts
- Source metadata20 pts
- Text length15 pts
- Chapters / structure15 pts
- EPUB file integrity20 pts
Total of 100 points, scaled to a 2.5-5.0 range. Editions with an empty description or a missing EPUB file are not scored.
Read the Text
This was originally published in the February 1, 1993 issue of Library Journal (volume 118, n. 2, pp 38-41). It may be freely reprinted for educational use, please let me know if you are redistributing it, I like to know if it's useful and where it's been. Please do not sell it, and keep this message intact.
When Senator Al Gore was evangelizing support for his visionary National Research and Education Network bill, he often pointed to the many benefits of a high-speed, multi-lane, multi-level data superhighway. Some of these included:
-- collaborating research teams, physically distant from each other, working on shared projects via high speed computer networks. Some of these "grand challenges" might model global environmental change, or new therapeutic drug research, or the design of a new airplane for inexpensive consumer air travel.
-- a scientist or engineer might design a product, which could be instantly communicated to a manufacturing plant, whose robotic machine could turn the drawing-board product into reality. One example of this is the capability to digitally measure a new recruit for an army uniform, transmit the information to a clothing manufacturer, and take delivery of a custom-tailored uniform the next day.
-- access to digital libraries of information, both textual and graphic. Besides hundreds of online public access catalogs, and full text documents, color illustrations of photographic quality, full motion videos and digital audio will also be available over the network.
In his many articles and speeches touting the bill, Gore often used an example of a little girl, living in a rural area, at work on a school project. Was she information-poor due to her physical location, far from the resources of large cities? No-- the National Research and Education Network would give her the capability to dial into the Library of Congress-- to collect information on dinosaurs.
Now that the NREN bill has been signed into law (12/91), and committees are being formed, and policies are being made, I'm still thinking about that little girl, and her parents, for that matter. In fact I've got some "Grand Questions" to pose.
1- How will we get access?
The Internet has been called the "Interim NREN", since it's what we have in place now.
I'm wondering how the family is going to get to the Internet "dial tone", let alone the NREN, especially since they live in a rural area. The information superhighway may be miles from their home, and it may be an expensive long-distance call to the "entrance ramp".
Or, the superhighway may run right through their front yard, but they can't make use of it because they have no computer, no modem, and no phone line to make the connection. What good is a superhighway if all you've got is a tricycle?
2- What will they be able to gain access to, and will their privacy be protected?
Beyond the infrastructure issues, I'm concerned about what kind of things will be available for them once they do get connected, how the resources will be arranged, and how they will learn to use these tools to advantage. Beyond that, how authoritative is the information in the digital collection, and how do we know for sure it came from a legitimate source? How confidential will their information searches be, and how will it be safeguarded?
3- Who will get access?
I'm concerned that even if the infrastructure and resource problems are resolved, that little girl still won't be allowed access, because a lot of folks don't think the Internet is a safe place for unaccompanied minors.
4- Does the family have any electronic rights? Electronic responsibilities? Are dinosaurs and a grade-school project too trivial for NREN?
Some people think the NREN should be reserved for scientists working on "Grand Challenges", not ordinary ones. Who will decide what constitutes "acceptable use"?
5- What is the future of the local public library?
Worse yet, I'm worried that the reason they are phoning the Library of Congress in the first place is that their local public library has shut its doors, sold off the book stock, and dismissed the librarian. What can public libraries do to avoid that future?
Brief Background: The Internet Today
Computers all over the world are linked by high speed telecommunications lines. On the other side of their screens are people of all races and nationalities who are able to exchange ideas quickly through this network.
This "brain to brain" interface brings both delight and despair, as evidenced by the following True Tales from the Internet:
-- Children all over the world participate in class collaborations, sharing holiday customs, local food prices, proverbs, acid rain measurements, and surveys such as a recent one from a fifth grade class in Argentina who wanted to know (among other things) "Can you wear jeans to school?".
Jean Armour Polly opens her 1993 article by invoking Senator Al Gore's vision of a high-speed data superhighway, but immediately pivots to a concrete image: a little girl in a rural area working on a school project about dinosaurs. This figure, borrowed from Gore's own speeches, becomes Polly's touchstone for interrogating the National Research and Education Network (NREN) bill. Rather than celebrating the legislation's passage, she poses "Grand Questions" about access, cost, and equipment. The article, originally published in Library Journal, blends policy analysis with a librarian's practical concern for who gets left behind.
The Little Girl as a Test Case
Polly returns repeatedly to the rural schoolgirl, using her to expose gaps in the NREN's promise. While Gore imagined her dialing into the Library of Congress, Polly asks how she will reach the network at all. The family may live miles from an "entrance ramp," facing expensive long-distance calls, or lack a computer, modem, or phone line entirely. Polly sharpens the point with a memorable analogy: "What good is a superhighway if all you've got is a tricycle?" This recurring figure anchors the article's skepticism, grounding abstract policy in a specific, vulnerable user.
From Grand Challenges to Grand Questions
Polly contrasts the NREN's touted "grand challenges"—collaborative research, digital libraries, remote manufacturing—with her own list of "Grand Questions." The first, and most developed, concerns access. She notes that the Internet, called the "Interim NREN," is the current reality, but rural and low-income communities may remain disconnected. The article's structure mirrors this tension: it begins with visionary bullet points, then systematically undercuts them with practical obstacles. Polly does not reject the NREN's potential, but insists that policy must address the gap between infrastructure and actual use.
Legislative Details and Digital Library Mandates
Midway through, Polly reproduces excerpts from the NREN bill, including specific appropriations for digital libraries. The National Science Foundation is directed to develop prototype digital libraries of scientific data, while NASA must create databases of remote-sensing images. Funding escalates from $10 million in 1993 to $50 million in 1997 for each agency. These details ground the article in legislative reality, but Polly does not comment on their adequacy. Instead, she lets the numbers speak, leaving readers to weigh the scale of investment against the access barriers she has raised.
Resources and the Librarian's Toolkit
A sidebar lists reports and studies, including McClure et al.'s Public Libraries and the INTERNET/NREN and a NCLIS report on library roles in the network. Polly also points to an FTP site for documents on academic freedom. This practical appendix reflects her dual role as network manager and librarian: she provides tools for readers to pursue the issues further. The article thus functions as both a critique and a resource, equipping librarians to engage with NREN policy. The closing sections, however, shift to Project Gutenberg's copyright and donation information, which are not part of Polly's original text.
Polly's article is best read as a policy intervention from a librarian's vantage point, not a technical blueprint. Readers should note how she uses a single imagined user—the rural girl—to test the NREN's promises. The excerpts provided are incomplete; the full article likely develops additional "Grand Questions" and may offer solutions. Approach the text as a snapshot of early 1993 debates, when the NREN was newly law but its implementation uncertain.
That little girl in the NREN piece—she stayed with me long after I closed the page, wondering if the promises meant anything where she stood. The same weight lingers in Boy Labour and Apprenticeship — Background and Themes, where policy words drift far above the actual lives of children who just needed a fair chance. It’s a quiet ache, that gap.
There are no reviews for this eBook.
What was your reading experience?
Capture what you thought, learned, and would like to remember.