Education in England in the Middle Ages Thesis Approved for the Degree of Doctor of Science in the University of London — Inside the Classic

The Gild as an Educational Institution

Parry devotes considerable attention to medieval gilds, arguing that their “most prominent characteristic was the religious element.” He cites early English gilds at Abbotsbury, Exeter, and Cambridge, and notes that the earliest available statement of gild purposes dates from 858, when the Archbishop of Rheims described them as uniting “for offerings, for mutual assistance, for funeral services for the dead, for alms, and for other deeds of piety.” Parry emphasizes that gilds were so integral to social life that “it is impossible to conceive of any social organisation which was entirely divorced from religion.” He then connects gilds directly to education: some had as their object “the aid of poor scholars, the maintenance of schools or the payment of schoolmasters.” This observation grounds the book’s central argument that educational provision was woven into the fabric of religious and communal organizations.

The Gild-Merchant and Craft Gilds

Parry distinguishes between religious and social gilds and two later developments: the gild-merchant and the craft gild. He traces the gild-merchant’s origins back to Roman “collegia” or “corpora opificum et artificium” under Numa Pompilius, though he declines to examine this critically, stating it is “foreign to our purpose.” Instead, he notes that after the Norman Conquest, towns suffered from war and castle-building, but once Norman rule was established, “an internal peace, such as had not been previously enjoyed, was secured,” allowing commerce to flourish and gilds-merchant to form. Parry’s language here is cautious: he presents the gild-merchant as arising from “a consciousness of a community of interest” and a desire for co-operation, rather than from any single cause. This section exemplifies his method of synthesizing secondary sources while maintaining a clear focus on educational implications.

Numbers and Exaggerations in Gild Records

Parry is alert to the unreliability of medieval numerical claims. He reports that Brentano stated there were twelve gilds in Norwich and Lynn, Gallienus counted 80 in Cologne, Melle about 70 at Lübeck, and Staphorst over 100 at Hamburg. But he immediately adds a note of skepticism: “Gilds were so very numerous and so marked a characteristic of the social life of the period that it is not to be wondered at if exaggerated statements were made as to their number.” He then cites Taylor’s claim of 909 gilds in Norfolk and 75 in Lyme Regis alone, without endorsing the figures. This critical stance—weighing evidence without accepting it uncritically—runs throughout the thesis. Parry’s own research was conducted under difficult conditions, as he notes in the preface: much of the book was written “whilst I was on military service (1914-9)” and dependent on notes compiled “at various times and places,” which may have led to “some omissions and inaccuracies.”

Thesis Structure and Scholarly Debt

Parry’s preface reveals the book’s scholarly lineage. He acknowledges Professor Foster Watson as the stimulus for his interest in educational history, and J. E. G. de Montmorency as “the first writer to give a connected account of the development of English Education,” whose work “blazed the trail.” Parry also thanks colleagues for proofreading and the Rev. Dr. Hughes for preparing the index. The thesis itself is organized chronologically, from the Introduction of Christianity to the Eve of the Reformation, and aims to identify “the factors which contributed to the educational development of the nation.” Parry’s method is documentary: he provides an appendix listing authorities consulted, and his footnotes cite specific pages and collections. The work is thus positioned as a contribution to a growing field, building on—but also correcting—earlier scholarship.

Parry’s thesis is best approached as a work of historical synthesis grounded in primary documents. Readers interested in the institutional history of English education will find detailed discussions of gilds, chantries, and cathedral schools, though the excerpts here focus on gilds. Parry’s critical eye for exaggerated claims and his explicit methodological disagreements with Leach make the book a valuable primary source for understanding early twentieth-century historiography of medieval education.